Tories call Starmer ‘a serial promise breaker’ in attack on Labour’s pledge card launch – UK politics live | Politics

Spread the love


Tory chair Richard Holden says in response to Labour launch Starmer doesn’t ‘stick to single pledge he has ever made’

In a statement issued by CCHQ responding to the Labour pledge card launch this morning, Richard Holden, the Conservative party chair, said Keir Stamer could not be trusted to keep his promises. He said:

Today’s speech was devoid of any plan for Britain. Sir Keir Starmer is a serial promise breaker who doesn’t have the courage or conviction to stick to a single a pledge he has ever made – just look at his last pledge card, which he abandoned the second he got the chance. His unfunded spending, higher taxes and amnesty for illegal migrants would take Britain back to square one.

Rishi Sunak and the Conservatives are sticking with the plan to build a brighter future for British families, with inflation down from 11.1 per cent to 3.2 per cent, the economy growing and £900 back in hard-working people’s pockets – as well as a fair immigration system with boat crossings down.

Richard Holden
Richard Holden Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images
Share

Updated at 

Key events

Sunak says he will remain as MP whatever election result, as he laughs off suggestion it’s planned for November

Rishi Sunak was on ITV’s Loose Women at lunchtime, where he may have dropped a hint that the election will definitely be in the autumn – although it is not entirely clear.

But he did insist that, whatever the result, he would stay in the House of Commons as MP for Richmond.

Towards the end of the interview Jane Moore, one of the four presenters, asked Sunak if he would remain an MP if he lost the election “in November”.

This prompted Sunak to laugh over-vigorously (his usual response to an awkward question), and while he was doing so another presenter, Judi Love, said: “I’ve got holiday booked then, so you need to let me know.”

Sunak said that “of course” he was staying as an MP. As the programme was ending, Moore tried one final time to ask if the election would be in November, and Sunak turned to Love to say what sounded like “Good for your holiday” as the applause started. Some reporters think he said “book your holiday”.

It sounded like a hint that the election will be in November – which is assumed to be his preferred date anyway. But that is based on the assumption that Sunak was assuming that Love would want her holiday to coincide with the election.

Political journalists don’t want the election to clash with their holidays, and most of us have not booked any time off in November at all.

Share

Momentum, the leftwing Labour group, has dismissed Labour’s six doorstep election pledges (see 10.12am) as too timid. A spokesperson said:

Britain has big problems, and they require big solutions. Sadly, these fixes fall desperately short of the bold policies needed to fix the Tories’ broken Britain, from mass building council housing to renationalising our public services. Worse still, Starmer is failing to break with the Conservatives’ disastrous austerity dogma.

Faced with similarly huge challenges in 1945, the post-war Labour Government brought sweeping change and investment to a country on its knees. Britain needs a real Labour alternative today, too.

And, echoing the attack line used by the Tories and the SNP (see 1.08pm), the spokesperson also said that Starmer could not be trusted to keep his promises. Referring to the 10 pledges Starmer made during the Labour leadership contest four years ago, the spokesperson said:

From raising taxes on the wealthiest to renationalising our public services, Keir’s leadership pledges are more popular and urgently needed than ever. Yet Keir broke his promises and today instead of transforming Britain, he offers minor tweaks to a failed Tory settlement.

Share
Keir Starmer speaking to some of the attendees at the launch of Labour’s election pledges at the Backstage Centre in Purfleet this morning. Photograph: Victoria Jones/PA
Share

Sue Gray suggests Stormont executive could benefit from more collective responsibility in evidence to Covid inquiry

One of Sue Gray’s many responsibilities as Keir Starmer’s chief of staff is carrying out leak inquiries. She did one recently into a leak to the Guardian.

This morning she was giving evidence to the UK Covid inquiry in Belfast, in her capacity as the former permanent secretary at Northern Ireland’s Department of Finance during the pandemic and, at least according to the PA Media write-up, quite a lot of her evidence related to leaks.

When Gray was in Northern Ireland, she was asked to investigate leaks from meetings of the Northern Ireland executive. The inquiry has been told that some key executive meetings were in effect live tweeted by journalist, who were being fed information in real time.

Gray told the inquiry she was struck by the difference between the culture in Whitehall, where for most of her career she was a civil servant, and at Stormont. She said:

I’m not going to say that everything is perfect there [at cabinet in London] but, you know, people do respect the process and [at] cabinet – often issues get resolved in cabinet committees, not always at cabinet – but you don’t read about [them], you occasionally read about differences of views, but there tends to be a certain discipline.

Gray said at Stormont, where there is a power-sharing executive, there are no defined rules around collective responsibility, as there are in London.

She said that even when the Tories were in coalition with the Liberal Democrats, collective responsibility was maintainted. She said:

I think they demonstrated great leadership in how they handled those issues, it didn’t break down in trust because actually it was a very honest and open and frank process.

As PA Media reports, Gray accepted the mandatory coalition system in Northern Ireland was different, pointing out that when she was working at Stormont there were five parties in the administration. But said she believed a similar process could be made to work in the region.

Gray was asked to give evidence to the inquiry as the only senior civil servant who had worked for both the devolved administration in Northern Ireland and the UK government during Covid.

Sue Gray, Keir Starmer’s chief of staff, leaving the Clayton Hotel in Belfast, after giving evidence there to the UK Covid inquiry this morning. Photograph: Liam McBurney/PA
Share

What Seb James, Boots CEO and close friend of David Cameron, said as he endorsed Labour at pledge card launch

Here is the full text of what Seb James, the Boots CEO, said at the launch of the Labour election pledges this morning.

Boots has 2,000 stores and pharmacies right across the country, and just over 50,000 team members.

Rachel [Reeves, the shadow chancellor] has asked me to share some of the things I think that are incredibly important to a business like Boots – for me, first and foremost, it’s stability. A stable economy provides the right platform for sustainable economic growth. And it’s that real focus on economic growth that is going to be so important in the next few years. The second thing is government and business really listening to each other and working together to grow our economy.

We need an industrial strategy that helps us plan for the long term, helps us to anticipate changing landscapes, emerging sectors, new skills, new technologies.

Another thing that I think is incredibly important is employment. Having a government that works with business to help get people up and down the country in some of the most deprived areas of our great nation, into work, and keep them in work. That ranges from having apprenticeship schemes properly helping business to re-skilling mature workers.

Now I must mention something close to my heart, Keir came to one of our Boots stores earlier in the year and we talked about the importance of looking after our high streets.

There is a Boots on almost every high street but high streets are not just a place that people come to shop, it’s a place of work – in some small towns, the only place of work. It’s a place to meet, to connect, to get health advice from your pharmacist, it’s the heart of our towns, and a thriving high street helps to build communities. And I think that’s going to be a really important gamechanger in the next few years. We need to invest in it, connect it to our digital worlds and look after it.

And finally, the cost of living – our customers are telling us that the pressures remain. We of course welcome these sensible fiscal measures to help put more money in people’s pockets and grow the economy, and that’s what I hope is going to happen.

As mentioned earlier (see 12.40pm), James is, or at least was, a very close friend of David Cameron. The Independent has written this up as “David Cameron’s Bullingdon Club pal endorses Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour”.

Share

Vaughan Gething sacks Welsh government minister over leak of phone message, which she denies

Vaughan Gething, the first minister of Wales has sacked his minister for social partnership following the leak of a phone message to the media, which she insists she was not behind, PA Media reports. PA says:

Gething, who was confirmed as first minister in March, said he had “no alternative” but to ask Hannah Blythyn, MS for Delyn, to leave his government.

But Blythyn insisted she was “clear and have been clear that I did not, nor have I ever leaked anything” and was “deeply shocked” at her dismissal.

Gething’s decision follows a report on the Nation.Cymru news website which featured a message posted to a ministerial group chat in August 2020 by Gething, stating that he was “deleting the messages in this group”.

Gething previously told the UK Covid-19 Inquiry that lost WhatsApp messages were not deleted by him, but by the Welsh parliament’s IT team during a security rebuild.

He told plenary last week that the leaked message was from a section of an iMessage group chat with other Labour ministers and related to internal discussions within the Senedd Labour group.

Gething denied the message contradicted the evidence he had given to the inquiry, adding that the message did not relate to pandemic decision making but “comments that colleagues make to and about each other”.

In a statement issued on today, Gething said: “Having reviewed the evidence available to me regarding the recent disclosure of communication to the media, I have regrettably reached the conclusion I have no alternative but to ask Hannah Blythyn to leave the government.

“I’d like to record my gratitude for the work the member has done to date, including her leadership through the fire and rescue services review, outstanding work leading the LGBTQ+ Action Plan For Wales and invaluable work on the Social Partnership and Public Procurement (Wales) Act.

“It is of vital importance we are able to maintain confidence amongst government colleagues so that we work as one to focus on improving the lives of the people in Wales.

“Given Hannah’s talents and experience, I have been clear there is a route back for her to take up a government position again in future.

“The government has offered ongoing support to the member.”

But Blythyn said: “I am deeply shocked and saddened by what has happened today. I am clear and have been clear that I did not, nor have I ever leaked anything. Integrity is all in politics and I retain mine.

“For a kid from Connah’s Quay, it is an immense privilege to serve the community that shaped me, let alone to have served in my country’s government. I will say no more at present.”

Share

The Tories and the SNP don’t agree on much, but they are both attacking Keir Starmer on the grounds that he can’t be trusted because he has gone back on too many promises. Here is the official SNP response, in a statement from Mhairi Black, the SNP deputy leader at Westminster.

Sir Keir Starmer’s speech was full of broken promises and empty slogans – demonstrating why voting SNP is the only way to stand up for Scotland, protect our NHS, and advance our journey towards independence.

On the biggest issues damaging the UK, from austerity cuts to Brexit, the Labour party is wedded to the same reckless policies as the Tories.

You can’t stabilise the economy if you are trashing it with Brexit, and you can’t deliver strong public services if you are imposing billions of pounds of cuts to our NHS, schools and police.

The problem for Sir Keir is that he has U-turned on nearly every policy he has ever promised – so it’s little wonder the public don’t trust a single promise he now makes.

And with no mention of Scotland throughout his speech, it’s clear that Sir Keir Starmer intends to be prime minister for England only.

Mhairi Black. Photograph: Murdo MacLeod/The Guardian
Share

Updated at 

Tory chair Richard Holden says in response to Labour launch Starmer doesn’t ‘stick to single pledge he has ever made’

In a statement issued by CCHQ responding to the Labour pledge card launch this morning, Richard Holden, the Conservative party chair, said Keir Stamer could not be trusted to keep his promises. He said:

Today’s speech was devoid of any plan for Britain. Sir Keir Starmer is a serial promise breaker who doesn’t have the courage or conviction to stick to a single a pledge he has ever made – just look at his last pledge card, which he abandoned the second he got the chance. His unfunded spending, higher taxes and amnesty for illegal migrants would take Britain back to square one.

Rishi Sunak and the Conservatives are sticking with the plan to build a brighter future for British families, with inflation down from 11.1 per cent to 3.2 per cent, the economy growing and £900 back in hard-working people’s pockets – as well as a fair immigration system with boat crossings down.

Richard Holden Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images
Share

Updated at 

Keir Starmer speaking at the Labour pledges launch this morning. Photograph: Leon Neal/Getty Images
Share
Ben Quinn

Ben Quinn

A cross party group of MPs have asked parliament’s justice select committee to investigate why British prosecutors dissuaded Swedish counterparts from abandoning attempts to extradite Julian Assange.

“Numerous questions” need to be answered about the role of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) when it came to the legal pursuit of the WikiLeaks founder by Swedish authorities, according to a letter by the MPs, John McDonnell, David Davis, Caroline Lucas and Jeremy Corbyn.

The intervention comes as a four-year legal saga surrounding US attempts to extradite Assange could enter their final phase next Monday when the court of appeal rules on whether or not to accept US assurances on how he will be treated if sent across the Atlantic.

The MPs point to emails released under the Freedom of Information Act to the Italian investigative journalist, Stefania Maurizi. They indicate that the Swedish authorities were eager to give up the case four years before they formally abandoned proceedings in 2017 and that the CPS dissuaded them from doing so. Other emails which the CPS should have retained were also deleted.

In their letter to Sir Bob Neil, Chair of the justice select committee, the MPs argue that the records released under FoI provide evidence that the Crown Prosecution Service helped create what they desribed as a “legal paralysis and diplomatic quagmire” surrounding Assange. They say:

Given the significance of the case of Julian Assange in relation to journalistic freedoms and the widespread public interest in the case, it is critically important that all the public bodies dealing with the case are seen to be acting in the public interest and acting appropriately.

Share

Labour’s pledge card launch – snap verdict

That could easily have been a formal general election campaign launch, and in so far as it served as a de facto campaign launch, Labour will view it as a success. It is rare for any political event aimed at the media to last more than an hour (they assume, rightly, that journalists have short attention spans), but this one zipped along nicely and after more than 90 minutes it still wasn’t gettting dull. We did not get anything new in terms of policy, and all the detail about the pledges (or “first “steps” as Labour calls them, at the risk of making Starmer sound like a toddler) was released under embargo yesterday. But there were two significant reveals.

First, the endorsements. No one will admit that they are going to change the way they vote just because X said they should, but endorsements can matter a lot because they signal to voters the X is a safe choice. Neil Basu used to be a very senior office in the Metropolitan police, and appears on the media a lot, and yet he has never endorsed Labour so obviously in the past. His appearance today was a surprise. But the more significant endorsement was from Seb James, the Boots CEO. He is not just head of a leading British business. As my colleague Jessica Elgot points out, he is (or at least was?) a very close friend of David Cameron.

This is who just endorsed Keir Starmer at the launch event today. Very close friend of David Cameron. Extraordinary. https://t.co/oak0ZxVcc0

— Jessica Elgot (@jessicaelgot) May 16, 2024

Second, the positioning. Many of the questions from the media were about the pledges not being ambitious or leftwing enough, and Starmer responded quite confidently. His argument was that they were just a start, and that there was more to come. What was striking, though, was that he seems unperturbed by this line of attack, and that is because it reinforces what seems to be the more important message he wants to convey – that Labour is now firmly aligned with mainstream public opinion. (See 11.34am.) That is where he wants to be because that is where he thinks parties win elections.

In his foreward to the 1997 manifesto Tony Blair said “New Labour is the political arm of none other than the British people as a whole.” Starmer has dropped the term “New Labour”, but otherwise his message this morning was much the same (although expressed in less hubristic language).

And the contrast with the Conservative party’s main campaign event this week was striking. Starmer’s speech was more impressive than Rishi Sunak’s on Monday, and it is hard to imagine the Tories unveiling any surprise endorsements during the election campaign likely to impress the media.

The launch went down well with journalists. This is what some of them are saying.

From my colleague Jessica Elgot

This is – by some measure – the most impressive event this Labour leadership has ever assembled. Guests inc CEO of Boots, senior counter terror officer, a terminal cancer patient… each one linked to a key offer to the public.

It’s a big contrast to Sunak’s speech on Monday..

— Jessica Elgot (@jessicaelgot) May 16, 2024

This is – by some measure – the most impressive event this Labour leadership has ever assembled. Guests inc CEO of Boots, senior counter terror officer, a terminal cancer patient… each one linked to a key offer to the public.

It’s a big contrast to Sunak’s speech on Monday..

Sunak’s speech was at a Westminster thinktank, watched only by journalists and Tory MPs and was overshadowed by a minor minister who was (inexplicably) speaking at the same time about banning lanyards she doesn’t like.

From Beth Rigby from Sky News

Labour’s ’first steps’ campaign event at a GE-style rally. Six pledges. Starmer on stage using each guest that’s spoken at the event to try to hammer home the message of “change”. Change change change on repeat pic.twitter.com/KCzpEqDa67

— Beth Rigby (@BethRigby) May 16, 2024

Labour’s ’first steps’ campaign event at a GE-style rally. Six pledges. Starmer on stage using each guest that’s spoken at the event to try to hammer home the message of “change”. Change change change on repeat

From the Telegraph’s Ben Riley-Smith

This Labour pledge card launch feels like a mini party conference. Key shad cab ministers speaking. Endorsements. Big stage festooned with slogans. Very different feel to Rishi Sunak’s think tank campaign framing speech on Monday.

— Ben Riley-Smith (@benrileysmith) May 16, 2024

This Labour pledge card launch feels like a mini party conference. Key shad cab ministers speaking. Endorsements. Big stage festooned with slogans. Very different feel to Rishi Sunak’s think tank campaign framing speech on Monday.

From James Ball from the New European

The contrast is quite stark – it’s not just that Sunak’s delivery lacked any energy, but the whole framing of the speech was enervating. It was in London, at a think tank, with no guests or anything to mark it. https://t.co/pLNcG2fW89

— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) May 16, 2024

The contrast is quite stark – it’s not just that Sunak’s delivery lacked any energy, but the whole framing of the speech was enervating. It was in London, at a think tank, with no guests or anything to mark it.

From Jack Elsom from the Sun

Aside from the massive land grab on traditional Tory turf, it’s really notable how much Starmer has developed as a public speaker in the past few years. I went to the initial missions launch early last year and it’s just another level.

— Jack Elsom (@JackElsom) May 16, 2024

Aside from the massive land grab on traditional Tory turf, it’s really notable how much Starmer has developed as a public speaker in the past few years. I went to the initial missions launch early last year and it’s just another level.

But Elsom was not impressed by Starmer’s answer to his question about sex education.

Starmer dodges question over whether he would keep or scrap the govt’s new sex education guidance, including the ban on teaching of gender identity.

Says he hasn’t looked at it yet, despite leading news agenda for days…

From Zoë Grünewald from the Lead

Starmer says his initial 2023 missions still apply, but these steps are the ‘first downpayments’ or ‘initial deliverables’ on those. I wonder if people will distinguish the difference. Because there is a danger it looks like he’s scaling back.

— Zoë Grünewald (@zoe_grunewald) May 16, 2024

Starmer says his initial 2023 missions still apply, but these steps are the ‘first downpayments’ or ‘initial deliverables’ on those. I wonder if people will distinguish the difference. Because there is a danger it looks like he’s scaling back.

Aside from that, I think a decent speech well delivered. But notably missing building, tackling poverty and worker’s rights. A lot of people want to hear about housing. I’ll be on @bbc5live to talk about it shortly.

Share

Updated at 





Source link